Here’s site curator Daniel Leonard’s note from the site:
“Charles Schulz’s Peanuts comics often conceal the existential despair of their world with a closing joke at the characters’ expense. With the last panel omitted, despair pervades all.”
A lot of people are comparing to Garfield minus Garfield, but this one has its own charms.
Its own bleak, fatalistic, existential charms.
[via Tom Hart]
Posted in Cartoonists, Experimental ComicsDiscussion (11)¬Kenn McDonald says:March 31, 2011 at 3:52 am
I’ve read this and Garfield minus Garfield. I’d have to give this one the edge. It may just be nostalgia on my part, having cut my comic strip teeth on Peanuts as a very small child, but I think carries so much more weight. Garfield without Garfield can be entertaining. rips my heart out.
ReplyThomas Childress says:March 31, 2011 at 4:36 amGarfield – Garfield has this wonderfully skewed view of our own neurosis, is just bleak in a black comedy kind of way. However the one with Snoopy pining away for his lost love is depressing, truly depressing. I need a hug…
ReplyJane says:March 31, 2011 at 7:51 amSee, I think that Peanuts’ pathos is augmented – possibly sweetened, but not concealed – by its punchlines, whereas Garfield (the character) usually detracts from the pathos to be found in his own strip. That’s where falls flat for me – where G.M.G. shows us something we haven’t noticed before, shines a torch on what should, at least to any reader that the strip has ever resonated with, be completely obvious.
ReplyMorgan Wick says:March 31, 2011 at 11:51 amThe comic in the image is a good example. In the original, Linus just puts his thumb back into his mouth and says “Touche.” Everything in the modified comic is still there in the original. Mind, I have similar issues with Garfield Minus Garfield.
ReplyLee Edward McIlmoyle says:March 31, 2011 at 9:28 amI think, somewhere in the back of my mind, I always thought that the secret to Schulz’ power and longevity lay in those first three panels, with the promise of the last. Stripped of it, you begin to understand how Schulz really was.
Compared to that, GwG is screwball comedy pitched funny.
ReplySamuraiArtGuy says:March 31, 2011 at 10:14 amOne of the reasons that works so much better than GWG is that Peanuts was a superior and better written strip in the first place. Sorry to say so, but Garfield has been recycling the same gags for over a decade now. It was a much more fun strip in it’s early days. Sparky kept it goin’ on full on right up till he passed way.
ReplyMichael says:March 31, 2011 at 1:51 pmAmen, brother!
ReplyMichael says:March 31, 2011 at 1:51 pmwow, this is amazingly profound in its own ‘end-of-the-world’ sort of way
ReplyTheo Macdonald says:March 31, 2011 at 10:19 pmTo me a lot of these strips still feel whole, and communicate the idea I always got from Peanuts in a more straightforward manner. This existentialism is what makes peanuts pretty much the indisputably best newspaper strip ever, vying only with Calvin and Hobbes, which shares a similar maturity.
I agree with SamuraiArtGuy that Garfield was just never as good as peanuts, I’ve never really liked it at all.
ReplyLaroquod says:March 31, 2011 at 11:52 pmThis one’s too obvious — remove the punchline from most comic strips and you will end up with something depressing, because comedy is just tragedy with a different ending. is not playing against anything very specific to Peanuts, but rather doing something to Peanuts that can be done to most comedy. Try removing the last act from a Shakespearean tragedy, for example. I am more impressed with Garfield minus Garfield because it was a far less obvious conceptual turn to make, and the results are more genuinely surprising in their peculiarity and message.
ReplyLaroquod says:March 31, 2011 at 11:53 pmI meant to type ‘Shakespearean comedy’ there as you probably guessed reading it.
Reply Comment¬Click here to cancel reply.NAME — Get an avatar
EMAIL — Not published
WEBSITE
XHTML: You can use these tags: -->
Upcoming Events
April 4-6, 2011
Baltimore, MD
CMS/DITA North America
Keynote Lecture
April 26, 2011
Evanston, IL
Sears Holdings Corporation
Private Lecture
May 3, 2011
Atlanta, GA
The Breman Museum
Details TBA
May 5, 2011
New York, NY
School of Visual Arts
Interaction Design
Details TBA
May 19, 2011
New York, NY
Doodle 4 Google Award Ceremony
Details TBA
May 31, 2011
Bergen, NORWAY
EuroVis 2011
Keynote Lecture
June 9-11
Chicago, IL
Northwestern University
Comics and Medicine Conference
Lecture
feed
feedburner
twitter
facebook
livejournal
livejournal feed
contactArchivesApril 2011March 2011February 2011January 2011December 2010November 2010October 2010September 2010August 2010July 2010June 2010May 2010April 2010March 2010February 2010January 2010December 2009November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009 News from the JurassicRecent PostsFriday Odds and EndsConnor WillumsenWhat Happens Next?Berkeley vs Santa Cruz?CategoriesAcademia (5)Announcements (19)Art History (9)Audio (7)Business (18)Cartoonists (157)Causes (22)Childhood (6)Comics (4)Comics History (14)Community (35)Doodles (7)Events (64)Experimental Comics (40)F.A.Q. (2)Failure (1)Family (32)Fan Art (3)Film (26)Games (7)Graphic Novels (38)Inventions (17)Jerks (1)Manga (3)Memes (5)Mobile Comics (10)Music (13)Non-Fiction Comics (17)Old Art (7)Photography (17)Press (33)Process (40)Sex (4)Site Update (3)Technology (46)The Sculptor (7)Theory (12)Things I Never Said (2)Thoughts (13)Travel (74)Video (59)Visual Communication (42)Webcomics (90)Writers (19)WTF?? (12)Contents ©2011 Scott McCloud
0 comments:
Post a Comment