This article by Austin Kleon offers some good solid advice. I don’t agree with everything, but it’s an inspiring list he offers, and almost anyone with creative aspirations will find something useful. [link via Cat Garza]
Meanwhile, thanks to writer Matt Cohen for an unexpected shoutout in HuffPost Business earlier this week (and hey, while we’re at it, thanks to another Huffington Post Writer, Kate Kelly, for another shoutout at the beginning of the month). Comics readers are everywhere!
Some of you may have seen the Newsarama report that I helped design the six variant covers for Marvel’s limited series X-Men: First Class adaptation this fall. That was obviously a typo. As anyone who knows me can tell you, I hardly needed help.
And finally, THESE KIDS are clearly ten kinds of wonderful, as are their teacher and her very cool site. Consider swinging by their Kickstarter page and lending your support to make their dream of a printed collection a reality.
Off to Maryland in a couple of days (check out the travel sidebar at right for the updated list of my busy spring schedule). Enjoy the weekend!
Posted in Cartoonists, Press, Process, WritersDiscussion (8)¬
Mike L says:April 1, 2011 at 6:46 amGah, I know Ursula! I just completed a commission for her. Small world.
Out of curiosity, which parts of Kleon’s article did you not agree with? I’d really like to know.
Reply
Scott says:April 1, 2011 at 7:20 amWell, for starters, if nothing is original, at what point in human history was that not true?
Sure, any idea or story can share elements of previous stories, even be built entirely from old parts, but there are times when something comes along that genuinely deserves to be called new. It’s happening all the time in small and big ways.
Einstein built his work on previous research, all scientists do, but who’s to say that the theory of general relativity wasn’t “original” or “new?” Of course it was!
Reply
Mike Leung says:April 1, 2011 at 6:16 pmAs far as any innovation can be said to be a disobedience against a convention, that which can be said to be original or new is dependent on that which is not. Everything presented to the public builds on the expectations of the recipients. Pure originality is a pretense of control that can’t exist.
ReplyScott says:April 1, 2011 at 7:25 amOh, and I know Ursula too. She was a student at MCAD when I taught the seminar there.
ReplyMike L says:April 1, 2011 at 7:43 amI’d think that what he meant was that nothing is wholly new, that everything is built on something that already exists, whether it’s in nature or is the result of someone else’s work. That’s what I took away. What we produce as artists is, in essence, a mash-up. While the result might be new, in that any given mash up has not been done before, or could not be done by any other individual, we, as humans, simply do not come up with something that is utterly new in and of itself, having no connections to anything previously made. What I figured is that, by accepting that fact, it removes a potential mental block from actually making work instead of just thinking about it, and trying to avoid any kind of repetition.
ReplyScott says:April 1, 2011 at 8:17 amYeah, that’s how I usually read that sentiment, and I agree that it can be a healthy thing for a lot of people to read.
There’s just a part of me that’s annoyed when some think they can dismiss at a stroke what I find most interesting about art. I’m not necessarily accusing Austin of that, but the statement tends to rouse the devil’s advocate in me.
Reply
Fountain says:April 3, 2011 at 10:56 amOK, I usually try to stay away from stuff like this but I couldn’t help it. I’m going to have to side with Scott on this one. I understand what the writer was trying to get at by saying that all art is just a “mashup” of previous ideas, but this idea doesn’t sit well with me. Essentially, this argument is true at it’s core, but what it does is dismisses the problem by reducing it to absurdity (reductio ad absurdum). True, art is a “mashup” of anything you could experience in reality (other art, people, the natural environment, articles you read etc. etc.), but this “mashup” is an inherent property of the universe. In fact, a person’s internal life could be looked at as a “mashup” of anything and everything that person has experienced. Our earth and all life therein is composed of a “mashup” of numerous elements formed by the explosions of supernovas. The author seems to be saying that we shouldn’t be intimidated by true creative acts because it’s just an absurd “mashup” of all the other shit that’s been done before and all the shit we’ve been exposed to (or selectively expose ourselves to). This type of thinking results in things like “zombie romance novels” and other completely random associations between seemingly unrelated concepts. My argument is that true creativity and innovation requires this and something more; a profound depth of insight. Relativity didn’t come along because Einstein shuffled a deck of ideas and randomly strung them together. And I realize that things like penicillin were discovered by accident, but as they say, “chance favors the prepared mind”.
Reply
Draculasaurus says:April 1, 2011 at 9:02 amYeah, people always say that nothing’s original, that there are only 12 or so different basic stories, etc.
I strongly disagree with that.
It’s true enough if you’re trying to write something with a broad appeal, that speaks to the human experience in general.
If you step outside that commonality paradigm, there are all kinds of new things to discover. It will never be as popular as Macbeth, but so what.
It’s the internet age, small, unique audiences are out there.
NAME — Get an avatar
EMAIL — Not published
WEBSITE
XHTML: You can use these tags: -->
Upcoming Events
April 4-6, 2011
Baltimore, MD
CMS/DITA North America
Keynote Lecture
April 26, 2011
Evanston, IL
Sears Holdings Corporation
Private Lecture
May 3, 2011
Atlanta, GA
The Breman Museum
Details TBA
May 5, 2011
New York, NY
School of Visual Arts
Interaction Design
Details TBA
May 19, 2011
New York, NY
Doodle 4 Google Award Ceremony
Details TBA
May 31, 2011
Bergen, NORWAY
EuroVis 2011
Keynote Lecture
June 9-11
Chicago, IL
Northwestern University
Comics and Medicine Conference
Lecture
feed
feedburner
twitter
facebook
livejournal
livejournal feed
contactArchivesApril 2011March 2011February 2011January 2011December 2010November 2010October 2010September 2010August 2010July 2010June 2010May 2010April 2010March 2010February 2010January 2010December 2009November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009 News from the JurassicRecent Posts3eanutsConnor WillumsenWhat Happens Next?Berkeley vs Santa Cruz?CategoriesAcademia (5)Announcements (19)Art History (9)Audio (7)Business (18)Cartoonists (157)Causes (22)Childhood (6)Comics (4)Comics History (14)Community (35)Doodles (7)Events (64)Experimental Comics (40)F.A.Q. (2)Failure (1)Family (32)Fan Art (3)Film (26)Games (7)Graphic Novels (38)Inventions (17)Jerks (1)Manga (3)Memes (5)Mobile Comics (10)Music (13)Non-Fiction Comics (17)Old Art (7)Photography (17)Press (33)Process (40)Sex (4)Site Update (3)Technology (46)The Sculptor (7)Theory (12)Things I Never Said (2)Thoughts (13)Travel (74)Video (59)Visual Communication (42)Webcomics (90)Writers (19)WTF?? (12)Contents ©2011 Scott McCloud
0 comments:
Post a Comment